Saturday, 28 September 2024

Freddie’s Double Birthday Treat in Germany

Earlier this month, to mark the day that would have been                                                                 Freddie Mercury’s 78th birthday, 5th September 2024, there were a couple of notable commemorations in Germany. 

The first was available nationwide: for the first time in the country a stamp depicting Freddie has been issued, which is the second in the ‘Deutsche Post’ (German Post Office) series 'Legends of Rock/Pop Music‘ started last year - the Freddie stamp being number two.  He would definitely have approved of his only predecessor here: Jimi Hendrix.

Of course, Freddie himself was an avid stamp collector as a child and his entire album can be viewed here.

Freddie and Queen have appeared on stamps in other countries – naturally in their own, the UK – but an internet ‘Google’ reveals that, interestingly, countries in Africa, predominantly francophone ones, have largely led the field in this regard.

You can read more about the German stamp, created by Deutsche Post's designer Jan-Niklas Kröger, in the English language press release about it here.

One person who made sure he was displaying the new stamp on his hotel’s own postcard was Dietmar Holzapfel, the proprietor of the Deutsche Eiche in Munich, and this was where the other Freddie celebration took place on Thursday: the unveiling of a mosaic which is now displayed on the hotel’s façade.

As one of the gay venues Freddie frequented during his time in Munich, the Deutsche Eiche’s restaurant would provide him with the opportunity to enjoy a ‘late late’ breakfast of an afternoon, or one of his favourite main dishes; if dining later on, he would have the latter accompanied by a ‘Rüscherl’ (a drink that was popular at the time - basically a mixture of brandy and cola).

The mosaic, which bears Freddie’s name along with the years he spent in Munich, is black and white, but was designed by Italian-German mosaicist Franco Notonica with certain stones that shimmer in all the rainbow colours when reflecting sunlight, varying according to the angle of view and weather conditions.

Among those in attendance at the unveiling were a couple of the sponsors (alongside Holzapfel) of the artwork: Herbert Hauke, of Munich’s ‘City of Music’ fame, and Nicola Bardola, the author of a book about Freddie’s years in Munich. In a place of honour at the window above the mosaic as it was unveiled was Reinhold Mack, Queen’s producer at the city’s Musicland Studios at that time. Mack mentioned in an interview with the Germanvinyl magazine ‘Mint’ in May this year just how much Freddie was at ease in Munich (in translation): “He thought it was great that he could just simply go out here and nobody paid any particular attention to him”.

 Holzapfel commented that the mosaic was a memento designed for eternity: “A mosaic doesn’t crumble or fade”, he remarked. It was also noted among the coverage that, until now, there hasn’t been a reminder of Freddie of this nature in Munich which, like the statue in Montreux, can be a point of focus for fans.

                                                                                                         

 Source material for the above summary was taken from the following articles:

https://munichcityofmusic.de/mosaik-briefmarke-fuer-freddie-zum-geburtstag

https://www.br.de/nachrichten/kultur/queen-star-freddie-mercury-in-muenchen-geehrt-mosaik-am-hotel-deutsche-eiche,UNTwYtc

https://www.abendzeitung-muenchen.de/muenchen/denkmal-fuer-freddie-mercury-sein-mosaik-in-muenchen-ist-enthuellt-art-1004588

https://muenchen.t-online.de/region/muenchen/id_100483368/freddie-mercury-neues-denkmal-in-muenchen-enthuellt.html


Saturday, 24 August 2024

Brian May: The Badgers, the Farmers and Me, review: is this the answer – or is this just fantasy? (Daily Telegraph)

 (Three stars)

Story by Anita Singh

Some people don’t take Brian May’s mission to save the badger as seriously as he does. This newspaper once carried the headline: “Queen’s Brian May is really upset about the badger cull, so he held a weird ‘badger funeral’.” That event – a mock funeral march past Defra headquarters, mourning that year’s cull – also provoked commentary on social media, such as: “Brian May should offer his spare room to a family of badgers,” and, “Why is Brian May obsessed with badgers?”

In Brian May: The Badgers, The Farmers and Me (BBC Two), the Queen guitarist provided an answer to that last question. His animal welfare work began with hedgehogs and other wildlife at a sanctuary in Surrey. So far, so uncontroversial. The sanctuary also took in injured and orphaned badgers. 

In the documentary, he watches a couple of them playing. “They are just adorable, these guys,” he says, but adds that he’s not campaigning because they’re cute. “As a species that inhabited Britain long before humans and who have an equal right to be here, they are now being brutally persecuted for a crime I believe they didn’t commit.”

That crime: spreading bovine TB. Any cow testing positive has to be removed from the herd and slaughtered – a fate that befalls around 20,000 cows every year. It can be ruinous for farmers. May visits a farm in Devon where a vet is carrying out tests; the farmer, clearly at the end of his tether, bursts into tears when he hears that one of his cows has tested positive.

Despite the cull, the problem has not been solved. In mid-Devon, cases of bovine TB are actually rising. But May thinks he has the answer: a trial he has conducted with a vet, Dick Sibley, appears to show that cow slurry is the source of transmission. There’s plenty of it in the sheds – a cow produces around 45 kg of dung every day – and the slurry is also put back out onto the fields where the animals graze. It attracts slugs and snails, which attract badgers, which are then infected.

In addition, the skin test used to identify TB only finds around half of the infected cows, and the others remain to infect others. Sibley said a better testing regime would involve swabbing a cow’s throat (not an easy task, as he demonstrated).

It all seemed pretty convincing. But it would, wouldn’t it? This is a film told from May’s point of view. Nobody was invited to challenge the findings or take a closer look at the science. Perhaps history will prove May right, but he’s not a dispassionate observer.

Wednesday, 29 May 2024

Visit from Uncle Freddie - Interview with Reinhold Mack, Mint Vinyl Magazine, Germany, May 2024. (Translated from the original German, so not verbatim).

 

With the line, “It’s got to be Mack, gonna get me on the track”, Queen immortalised Reinhold Mack in their song Dragon Attack. Even before he met the band in 1979, Mack had made a name for himself as a sound engineer at Musicland Studios. Thus he sat at the mixing desk on albums by Deep Purple, the Rolling Stones, Led Zeppelin and the Electric Light Orchestra. With his effective work method and creative impulses as co-producer, the now 77-year-old ushered in a new era in Queen’s career. Jörg Sädler spoke with Mack about his friendship with Freddie Mercury and the latter’s relationship with Munich.

Reinhold, how did the collaboration with Queen come about?

Reinhold Mack: Through strange coincidences. I was in Los Angeles at the time, working with Gary Moore. There I encountered Giorgio Moroder. He asked me why I wasn’t in Munich – Queen were in the Musicland Studio just then. So I rang there but nobody knew anything about it. A few days later I bumped into Giorgio once more and he asked me again why I was still in California. Then I thought he probably knew something that wasn’t supposed to be public. On the spur of the moment I bought a flight ticket and, once in Munich, went directly from the airport to the studio. And in fact there was a huge amount of equipment there! A roadie told me that Queen were just coming from Japan and had to spend two more weeks abroad for tax reasons.  So I set up a few things and prepared the sound.

Specific recordings weren’t yet planned, however?

No. But a little later Freddie Mercury showed up and asked me amiably what I was doing there. I said I’d heard that there was something for me to do here. Freddie wasn’t at all taken with that at first. But as the weather was fine we just decided to go to a beer garden.

Your first meeting then led directly to a hit.

Back in the studio, Roger Taylor and John Deacon were there too by then. Freddie suggested trying out an idea which he'd had at the hotel. The three of them then did two takes of the song, and I simply recorded them. At first they didn’t want to listen to it again, but I persisted until they did. They liked it, and they decided to finish off working on the track. That was Crazy Little Thing Called Love. You couldn’t have a better debut, really.

So the song was created without Brian May?

He wasn’t there yet, and Freddie said, “Let’s do it quickly – otherwise Brian’ll have his ideas and everything will go on for ages”. When he came, he was to play a solo for it. I suggested that he didn’t use his Red Special, but Roger’s old Fender Telecaster. It seemed the right thing for this happy-go-lucky rock ‘n’ roll number. That’s what he did, breaking in his solo about ten to twelve times. I kept recording it on the same track though. The last recording can therefore be heard on the final version. But it’s good too (laughs). Later he complained at great length in an article in Melody Maker that I’d more or less forced him to play on a Telecaster and that the solo would have sounded just as good on his guitar. I think he still holds that against me to this day.

The Game was your first collaboration together. As with the four following albums, you were shown not only as sound engineer, but also as co-producer. What’s behind that?

The Game arose over a long period of time, during which there were repeated breaks. So the production credit simply developed because of that. There wasn’t a big plan, but, in principle, our two worlds came together. Deacy (John Deacon) had said in an interview shortly beforehand that Queen didn’t need a producer anymore because they now understood how to work in the studio. But they were still rather used to classical methods and, as my approach was totally different, the band were really taken aback. For example, whenever there was a mistake on the production of a backing track or it was desired that it be put together from various recordings, you used to have to cut the two-inch tape with a razor blade and glue the takes together. That was laborious, and something of a nightmare – you weren’t allowed to make a mistake there. I was more direct – for example, I worked with punch-in technology, whereby the recording on to tape continued and then I started the new recording live as well. Then a backing track was finished much more quickly.

In general, the effectiveness of your method of working seems to have impressed the band.

Freddie, in particular, was always enthusiastic about new things. Above all he was impressed by the speed with which a lot of things now happened. It wasn’t the old English way where you had to smoke a joint first in order to get something done. Or that you beat around on the snare drum for two hours in search of the perfect sound, or kept swapping round the microphones, or tried out guitar sounds for ages. I think that’s nonsense anyway, because the normal ear – and I include my hearing here too – can’t make out those subtle nuances.

Before Queen you were also the sound engineer on several albums by the Electric Light Orchestra. What that something of a preparation for the work with Queen?

That was really a totally different job. Every day started around eleven o’clock late morning and then often went on until after midnight; in some instances for months on end. But I also learned a lot and kept improving. Jeff Lynne was very demanding and if he wasn’t quite sure what should happen next with something, he gave me a lot of time to try things out: strange microphone arrangements, effects, broken sounds and so on. We inspired each other a lot.

Along with your technical know-how, you also contributed new musical input to Queen. Another One Bites the Dust is a good example.

Deacy had this bass riff and asked me my opinion on it. My answer was that he might get into legal trouble with Bernard Edwards and Nile Rodgers because it sounded somewhat like Chic’s Good Times. But we did it all the same. I put together a drum loop. Admittedly, Roger, as a drummer, wasn’t enthusiastic at the beginning, but then did play a few fills and stops over it.

The idiosyncratic sound effects are quite striking.

The piece was initially still very fragmentary. There was only the bass and the loop running through. At that time there was no digital production where you could directly see on a monitor where you just were in the track. In order to orientate yourself, you thus had to count along to the beats; and in order to have clues so you could know where changes took place or what the structure was like, I inserted these backward-running piano notes, which I additionally sent through a delay – a Marshall Time Modulator. Gradually the track developed out of that. It was a little laborious, but worth it: after Bohemian Rhapsody, Another One Bites the Dust is Queen’s greatest hit.

While it was always stressed on the first Queen albums that no synthesisers were used, on the cover of The Game it says the opposite: “This album includes the first appearance of a synthesizer (an Oberheim OBX) on a Queen album”. Was it your idea to work with that?

Well, there was an OBX in the studio. There was a Fairlight too, but nobody was able to operate it correctly. I simply suggested the insertion of a swoosh or some other sound now and again. Or to use the synthesizer to support the vocals or individual instruments.

Synthesizers were more present on the subsequent Queen albums, and particularly evident on Hot Space, which was stylistically out of the ordinary.

That was already way ahead in technical terms – the sounds, the programming. You hear a lot of things there which weren’t around before. In order to keep on developing, you have to move forward and also allow for something new. Only Freddie thought it was good, though – the other three weren’t so enthusiastic. And the album came out too early, if you like  – six months later there was the ‘Aerobics Wave‘.  Leg warmers and Spandex were in vogue and songs appeared in the charts with frequent mentions of “body” and “muscle”. A song like Body Language would have fitted in well there.

As co-producer, were you able have a direct influence on the formation of the tracks?

Of course I could make suggestions, but otherwise there was no chance with this band. You really had to adopt a psychological approach. My wife’s a psychologist and during her studies I often accompanied her to lectures because it was of interest to me as well. What I want to say is – it’s bad, of course, to tell someone directly that he’s messing things up – but rather you try to come in from the angle of buoying him up and saying how great it is. Then you can say that it would perhaps be even better if a track is left off here or something else is added there. You simply have to sell the idea in such a way that the person believes it was his.

Were there arguments in the studio?

When I started working with Queen, I met their ex-producer Roy Thomas Baker for lunch. I asked him what they were like. ”Difficult at the best of times!” was the response. There were really big clashes amongst the four of them, and I believe I’m one of the few people who was allowed to be there for those. Normally everyone was sent out whenever they did some straight talking. I remember, for instance, that Freddie once said to Brian “Go with the times at last and get your hair cut!” And then sparks really flew. Such things as that. There were often angry words, even in the creative context.  But because the band’s structure was a democracy in the sense that the writer of the song called the shots as to how and whether something was done, the others would grumpily fall into line, more or less.

You got to know the band in close proximity. How would you characterise the four of them?

Freddie had the great gift of being able to create something brilliant within half an hour. The finer points, like finding a beginning, a shift, or an end for a song, would then take somewhat longer. But the basic idea, the heart of a song, he would get straightened out very quickly. And as a singer he was, of course, simply magnificent. He could’ve sung the news and it would’ve been great. As a showman he always did his thing for the public and the press, but otherwise he said of himself that in private he was the most boring person in the world.

And the other three?

Brian’s star sign is Cancer: likelier to be slow and very much bound to his ideas. He’s a perfectionist, who might still, even now, brood over some notes that he thinks he hasn’t played perfectly. He still gets worried and pretty much clings to the ideas he has. Roger was always around when there were the greatest prospects for success. If Freddie did something that he thought was good, then he was right behind him and supported him to the hilt. He did exactly the same thing with Brian. By that I don’t mean that he was spineless – he was just a pragmatist in this regard. And Deacy often had a fixed view of things, which he sometimes expressed, but sometimes not, in which case he would just go along with things. He’s a really nice guy - rather on the reserved side -  he didn’t like to be in the line of fire.

Then again, you and your family formed ties with Freddie in a friendship that lasted many years, right up to his death.

That just developed through our collaboration. Freddie was always a person who paid attention to the having the right social framework – when we finished in the studio, we often went off to eat. He asked everyone who was there if they wanted to come along; my wife was to come with us too. So, over time, it became a friendship. I stayed at his place when I had work to do in London – sometimes my family was with me. That was completely normal. We never wanted anything from him, and on that basis a real relationship of trust developed between us. That was certainly unusual. Unique.

He also had a close relationship with your three sons, didn’t he?

Yes, even today they still have good memories of him. He was often at our place and played table tennis or football with the children. And he certainly couldn’t be beaten at table tennis (laughs). It was very familial. My kids called him Uncle Freddie. And when our son Freddie was born in 1982, he and John Deacon became his godfathers.

Freddie felt so at ease in Munich that he had an apartment there for a long time. What made the town so attractive to him?

He thought it was great that he could just simply go out here and nobody paid any particular attention to him. He could go to Beck’s with my wife and buy track suits and t-shirts and eat a croissant on the street at Dallmayr’s without it being of great interest to anyone. And of course he found the Munich gay scene very captivating. Here he could go into bars without causing a stir, which wasn’t possible in London. Not far from his house in Kensington there was also a well-known gay club, the Tropicana, but he couldn’t go in there because photographers were constantly lying in wait.

Did you accompany him on his nightlife forays?

Of course. I was certainly one of the few straight men who ever went to Mineshaft (laughs). Freddie had a bodyguard who was two metres five tall and just as broad. He told him, “Wolli, look after Mack!” So I was able to move everywhere with no problems and look around. Wolli always stood behind me. In this way I saw a few things that I definitely shouldn’t have. But that was okay really. 

You worked together on recording Freddie’s only solo album, Mr Bad Guy. He’d had the idea for it for a long time. Was your friendship the catalyst for his finally setting about it?

At that time the band was running on the back burner. Nobody really knew where things should be heading. I suggested that he used the opportunity to do his own stuff at last. And so we just got started on it. It developed little by little and it was one and a half years before the album was finished. I always worked hard on it; as for him, not always. I often went to his apartment and had to motivate him: “Come on now, get into the studio. Work!”

With the disco and synthiepop influences the album took a different direction from the things Freddie did with the band.

On no account did he want to do a kind of Queen offshoot. For that reason the things became totally different musically speaking. It certainly reverberated from his expeditions through the clubs.

You also participated on solo records by Brian May and Roger Taylor. How was that different from working with Freddie?

That was totally different. I’ll say it like this: if something was considered a good idea at the start, but then established that it didn’t work so well after all, Freddie would always say immediately, “Away with it!” The gift of being able to handle that or accept an alteration was less strongly pronounced in the two of them.

Queen’s twelfth album A Kind of Magic was your last collaboration. Here you were only involved in part of it.

Only in half of it. Some of the songs were initially created for the film Highlander. But they weren’t enough for a whole album. I didn’t have any more time, though, because I was already dealing with a Meatloaf record. So Brian and Roger continued working in Montreux with David Richards as sound engineer and co-producer. There was a release date and the album had to be finished.

Did you stay in touch with the band afterwards?

With Freddie always. With Deacy less and less over time. He was also a father of six children by then. If we met on some occasion or other, everything was always peace, joy and sweetness. But we weren’t chatting regularly on the phone about anything and everything anymore.

Did your contact with Freddie change as his illness became ever more apparent?

We were at his place a few more times. And at some point it was clear that he was in a bad way. As it came towards the end, we still talked to each other on the phone, but if we wanted to visit him, he would pull back. He didn’t want us to see him in that state. Phoebe – his Personal Assistant Peter Freestone – recounted that he weighed less than 40 kilos at the end and had lost his sight as well. Freddie just didn’t want the children or us to be faced with that. He wanted to be remembered as full of life and fit. That was really a noble-minded gesture.